Free Da 2166 9 1 Form in PDF

When filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form, consider the following key takeaways:

• Accurate Information is Essential: Ensure that all administrative data in Part I is filled out correctly. This includes the rated NCO's name, SSN, rank, and unit information. Any inaccuracies can lead to complications in the evaluation process.
• Understand the Signature Implications: The rated NCO's signature does not imply agreement with the evaluations but confirms that the administrative data is correct. It is important to be aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3.
• Performance Evaluation is Comprehensive: The evaluation in Part IV covers various aspects such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each area requires specific comments to support the ratings given.
• Senior Rater's Role is Crucial: The senior rater assesses the rated NCO's overall potential compared to peers. This evaluation can significantly impact future assignments and career progression.

The DA Form 2166-9-1, which is an NCO Evaluation Report for Sergeants, shares similarities with the DA Form 1059, known as the Academic Evaluation Report. Both documents serve as performance evaluations, but the DA Form 1059 focuses specifically on academic achievements and training outcomes. Just as the 2166-9-1 assesses leadership and professional competencies, the 1059 evaluates a soldier's performance during courses and schools, providing insights into their capabilities and potential for future assignments.

The New York Motorcycle Bill of Sale form is a legal document used to record the sale of a motorcycle in New York State. This form helps protect both the buyer and seller by providing clear details about the transaction. Understanding this form is essential for anyone looking to buy or sell a motorcycle in New York. For more information, you can visit nytemplates.com/blank-motorcycle-bill-of-sale-template/.

Another document that aligns with the DA Form 2166-9-1 is the DA Form 67-9, which is the Officer Evaluation Report. While the 67-9 is tailored for officers, it similarly includes sections for performance evaluation, potential assessment, and comments from raters and senior raters. Both forms emphasize the importance of leadership qualities and professional development, ensuring that individuals are assessed based on their contributions to the Army's mission.

The DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form, also bears resemblance to the 2166-9-1. This form is used for documenting counseling sessions, providing a platform for leaders to discuss performance, goals, and areas for improvement. Both documents aim to foster communication between leaders and subordinates, promoting a culture of feedback and continuous development within the Army.

Similar to the 2166-9-1, the DA Form 703, or the Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard, evaluates an individual's performance, but it specifically focuses on physical fitness. Both forms require the documentation of specific metrics—performance in various areas, whether it be leadership skills or physical fitness levels. Each serves as a tool to assess readiness and effectiveness in fulfilling Army duties.

The DA Form 2-1, or the Personnel Qualification Record, is another document that parallels the 2166-9-1. This form provides a comprehensive overview of a soldier's qualifications, assignments, and performance history. While the 2166-9-1 captures performance over a specific period, the DA Form 2-1 offers a broader view of a soldier's career, including educational achievements and training experiences.

The DA Form 4187, which is a Personnel Action form, shares a purpose of documenting changes and evaluations within a soldier's career. Although it is more administrative in nature, it can reflect performance-related actions, such as promotions or disciplinary actions. Both forms contribute to the overall assessment of a soldier's career trajectory and readiness for future responsibilities.

Another similar document is the DA Form 2446, the Noncommissioned Officer Record Brief. This form summarizes a soldier's career information, including assignments, training, and evaluations. Like the 2166-9-1, it is used in career management and decision-making processes, helping leaders understand a soldier's qualifications and readiness for advancement.

The DA Form 350, or the Individual Training Plan, is also comparable to the 2166-9-1. It outlines training requirements and goals for soldiers, focusing on professional development. Both documents emphasize the importance of training and evaluation in preparing soldiers for their roles, ensuring that they are equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to succeed.

Additionally, the DA Form 7652, which is the Enlisted Record Brief, provides a summary of a soldier's career, similar to the DA Form 2-1. It includes performance evaluations and assists in career progression decisions. Both forms play a crucial role in tracking a soldier's development and readiness for future assignments.

Lastly, the DA Form 268, known as the Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Actions, is relevant as it documents actions that may impact a soldier's career based on performance issues. While the 2166-9-1 focuses on evaluating performance positively, the DA Form 268 can reflect negative assessments that may require further action. Both documents highlight the importance of performance evaluations in managing a soldier's career and ensuring accountability within the ranks.

Guidelines on Writing Da 2166 9 1

After gathering the necessary information, you can begin filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form. This form is essential for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) and requires accurate details to ensure proper assessment. Follow these steps carefully to complete the form.

1. Part I - Administrative Data:
   • Enter the name (Last, First, Middle Initial) of the rated NCO.
   • Provide the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number.
   • Fill in the rank of the rated NCO.
   • Input the date of rank.
   • List the Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code (PMOSC).
   • Include the unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
   • Specify the status code.
   • Enter the Unit Identification Code (UIC).
   • Indicate the reason for submission.
   • Fill in the period covered from start date to end date, including year, month, and day.
   • Specify the rated months.
   • Include non-rated codes if applicable.
   • State the number of enclosures.
   • Provide the rated NCO's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
2. Part II - Authentication:
   • Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • The rater must sign the form.
   • Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD) of signing.
   • Include the rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment of the rater.
   • Provide the rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
   • Enter the name of the senior rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Provide the senior rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
   • The senior rater must sign the form.
   • Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD) of signing.
   • Include the rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment of the senior rater.
   • Provide the senior rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
   • For supplementary review, enter the name of the supplementary reviewer (Last, First, Middle Initial).
   • Specify the rank, PMOSC/organization duty assignment of the supplementary reviewer.
   • Indicate if a review is required (Yes/No).
   • Add any comments from the supplementary reviewer.
   • The supplementary reviewer must sign and date the form (YYYYMMDD).
   • Provide the supplementary reviewer’s email address (must be .gov or .mil).
3. Part III - Duty Description:
   • Enter the principal duty title.
   • Specify the duty MOSC.
   • Describe daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and dollars.
   • List areas of special emphasis.
   • Include any appointed duties.
4. Part IV - Performance Evaluation:
   • Indicate APFT pass/fail/profile status and date.
   • Provide height and weight measurements.
   • State if within standard (add comments if failed).
   • Assess character and provide bullet comments.
   • Evaluate presence with comments.
   • Assess intellect and provide comments.
   • Evaluate leadership and provide comments.
   • Assess development and provide comments.
   • Evaluate achievement and provide comments.
   • Provide overall performance rating by the rater.
5. Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
   • Select a box to represent the rated NCO’s potential.
   • Provide comments on the rated NCO’s potential.
   • List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

Understanding the DA 2166 9 1 form can be challenging, and several misconceptions often arise. Here are five common misunderstandings:

• Misconception 1: The form is only for evaluation purposes.

This form serves multiple functions, including documenting administrative data, performance evaluations, and duty descriptions. It's not solely an evaluation tool.

• Misconception 2: Only the rater completes the form.

While the rater plays a significant role, the rated NCO must also provide input and sign the document. Their signature confirms the accuracy of the administrative data.

• Misconception 3: The rated NCO's signature indicates agreement with the evaluation.

The rated NCO's signature does not mean they agree with the assessment. It simply verifies that they have seen the completed report and that the data is correct.

• Misconception 4: The form is only relevant during the evaluation period.

This form can be used for various administrative purposes beyond just the evaluation period. It helps track performance and professional development over time.

• Misconception 5: There is no appeals process for evaluations.

There is an appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. If a rated NCO disagrees with their evaluation, they can follow the established procedures to contest it.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the Army. However, it is often accompanied by several other forms and documents that help provide a comprehensive assessment and ensure all necessary information is captured. Below is a list of these commonly used forms and documents.

• DA Form 2166-9: This is the overall NCO Evaluation Report, which includes information on the NCO's performance and potential. It summarizes the evaluations provided in the DA Form 2166-9-1 and is used for official record-keeping.
• Motor Vehicle Bill of Sale: This important form verifies the transfer of ownership of a vehicle in Ohio, including essential details such as make, model, and VIN. To access a blank template, visit https://fillable-forms.com.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, this document is used to record counseling sessions between leaders and their subordinates. It helps track progress and areas needing improvement.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is essential for evaluating an NCO's physical readiness and overall fitness.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used for measuring body composition. They ensure that service members meet the Army's height and weight standards, which is crucial for maintaining military readiness.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER), used for evaluating officers. While it serves a different rank, it may be referenced for comparative evaluations or assessments of leadership qualities.
• DA Form 201: The Military Personnel Record Jacket (MPRJ) is a comprehensive collection of a service member’s records, including evaluations, awards, and assignments. It provides context for the evaluations conducted.
• AR 623-3: This Army Regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the evaluation process. It serves as a guideline for completing the DA Form 2166-9-1 and related documents.
• DA PAM 623-3: This pamphlet provides detailed instructions on the evaluation process and how to complete the forms correctly. It is a valuable resource for both raters and rated NCOs.

These documents work together to create a complete picture of an NCO's performance, potential, and overall readiness. Understanding each form's purpose can help ensure that evaluations are thorough and accurate, ultimately supporting the professional growth of service members.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, attention to detail is crucial. Here are some guidelines to ensure you complete the form correctly:

• Do double-check all personal information. Ensure that the name, SSN, and other identifying details are accurate to avoid any processing delays.
• Do follow the specified format. Use the correct date format (YYYYMMDD) and be consistent with how you enter information throughout the form.
• Do seek clarification if unsure. If any part of the form is confusing, ask a supervisor or a knowledgeable colleague for assistance.
• Do keep a copy of the completed form. Retaining a copy for your records can be helpful for future reference or in case of disputes.

• Don't leave any sections blank. Fill out all required fields to ensure the form is complete and can be processed without issues.
• Don't use abbreviations or acronyms. Write out all terms fully to avoid misunderstandings, especially in the duty description section.
• Don't forget to sign and date. Ensure that all required signatures are included to validate the form.
• Don't rush through the process. Take your time to review each section carefully before submission to minimize errors.

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward task, but many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to complications. One frequent error is failing to provide complete names in the administrative data section. It is essential to include the last name, first name, and middle initial for clarity. Missing or incorrect information can delay processing and create confusion.

Another mistake involves the Social Security Number (SSN) or Department of Defense (DOD) ID number. Individuals sometimes enter incorrect numbers or leave this section blank. This information is crucial for identification purposes. Ensure that the number is accurate to avoid any issues with the evaluation report.

Some people overlook the importance of the "Reason for Submission" section. This part requires clear and specific information regarding why the evaluation is being submitted. Providing vague or incomplete reasons can lead to misunderstandings and may affect the evaluation's validity.

Inaccuracies in the "Period Covered" section are also common. This section must reflect the exact dates of the evaluation period. Errors here can lead to a mismatch between the evaluation and the actual time frame of performance being assessed.

Another frequent oversight is neglecting to include the rated NCO's email address. This contact information is necessary for communication regarding the evaluation. Ensure that it is entered correctly, using a .gov or .mil domain.

Many individuals also forget to sign and date the form appropriately. The Rater's and Senior Rater's signatures are required to authenticate the evaluation. Missing signatures can result in the form being returned for correction, delaying the entire process.

Some people fail to provide comments in the evaluation sections. Each area, such as "Character" and "Presence," requires specific feedback. Without these comments, the evaluation lacks depth and may not accurately reflect the rated NCO's performance.

In addition, not addressing the APFT (Army Physical Fitness Test) results properly can lead to complications. If the rated NCO has failed the APFT or is on profile, comments must be included. This information is critical for understanding the individual's physical readiness.

Lastly, individuals often neglect to review the completed form thoroughly before submission. It is essential to double-check all entries for accuracy and completeness. A final review can catch mistakes that may have been overlooked initially.

By being mindful of these common mistakes, individuals can ensure that their DA 2166-9-1 forms are filled out correctly, facilitating a smoother evaluation process.